![]() 04/30/2015 at 12:33 • Filed to: planelopnik | ![]() | ![]() |
This one should be pretty easy. No reverse GIS, please. That’s cheating and you know it.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 12:37 |
|
Martin P6M SeaMaster, yo.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 12:38 |
|
It’s this one:
![]() 04/30/2015 at 12:39 |
|
Aye, matey. Fascinating story behind that plane, actually. 6 months from service, crews in training, and it was yanked in favor of nuclear subs.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 12:40 |
|
No, it’s that one.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 12:40 |
|
I always liked the engines-above-the-wings aircraft designs. They’re kind of funky.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 12:41 |
|
On the plus side, aircraft maintainers everywhere let out a sigh of relief.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 12:44 |
|
Someone’s been working those traps...
![]() 04/30/2015 at 12:48 |
|
Why?
![]() 04/30/2015 at 12:52 |
|
M6M
It looks so good.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 13:00 |
|
Holy shit... it’s a sea plane... how dope is that???
![]() 04/30/2015 at 13:08 |
|
There’s nothing quite like working a new airframe that doesn’t yet have books full of technical data available to mechanics. It’s a bit of a grey area that brings with it risks and can become a point of contention among ground crew.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 13:13 |
|
I think that pic of it being a sea plane just above this answered my question.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 13:20 |
|
That too. :P